5 things you need to know about protected conversations
Since 29 July 2013, employers have been able to have “off the record” conversations with their employees regarding the termination of their employees’ employment in the knowledge that such conversations are in certain circumstances “protected”.
What is the purpose of a protected conversation?
Protected conversations are a vehicle for making an offer and negotiation before the termination of an employee’ employment, with a view to it being terminated on terms agreed between the employer and the employee. Such terms will normally be recorded in a settlement agreement. The pre-termination conversations and terms of settlement are protected in so far as they cannot be used in any subsequent employment tribunal (ET) claim for unfair dismissal.
The inadmissibility of protected conversations and the terms of any settlement agreement are enshrined in section 111A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA).
What situations does a protected conversation cover?
Protected conversations are designed with a view to ending an employee’s employment where there has been no previous dispute or issue with that employee’s conduct, capability or the viability of their role.
Prior to 29 July 2013, employers had sought to have “without prejudice” conversations with employees where there was no dispute surrounding the employees’ employment. The risk employers faced was that if an employee did not agree to the termination of their employment they could in certain circumstances allege that such a conversation was a breach of the implied term of trust and confidence entitling them to resign and claim constructive unfair dismissal. Alternatively, if the employer was to dismiss an employee after a “without prejudice” conversation and after the employer subsequently followed a dismissal process, the employee could bring a claim for unfair dismissal on the basis that the dismissal was predetermined. In such circumstances, the employee would in support of such a claim refer to the “without prejudice” conversation having taken place before the dismissal process started when there was no live dispute.
Note: where there is a live dispute, without prejudice conversations between employer and employer will remain confidential and inadmissible.
What are the requirements for a protected conversation?
For conversations to be “protected” and to retain their confidentiality and inadmissibility in an ET there must not be any “improper behaviour” in the negotiating process. What constitutes improper behaviour is ultimately for an ET to decide on the facts and circumstances of each case. However, improper behaviour will include behaviour that would be regarded as ‘unambiguous impropriety’ under the without prejudice rule (eg fraud, perjury or blackmail). The Acas Code of Practice – Settlement Agreements (Code) provides a non-exhaustive list of improper conduct, which includes:
- all forms of harassment, bullying and intimidation, including through the use of offensive words or aggressive behaviour;
- physical assault or the threat of physical assault and other criminal behaviour;
- all forms of victimisation;
- discrimination because of age, sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion or belief, transgender, pregnancy and maternity and marriage or civil partnership; and
- putting undue pressure on a party (eg an employer saying before any form of disciplinary process has begun that if a settlement proposal is rejected then the employee will be dismissed).
Where there is improper behaviour by an employer anything said or done in pre-termination negotiations will normally be admissible as evidence.
Are there any exceptions to a protected conversation?
Certain protected conversations are not covered by section 111A of the ERA that relate to complaints of:
- automatically unfair dismissal, such as, whistleblowing, union membership, health and safety or asserting a statutory right;
- discrimination, harassment, victimisation or other treatment prohibited by the Equality Act 2010; and
- breach of contract or wrongful dismissal.
In such situations, the without prejudice rule may still apply if there was a live dispute between employer and employee.
What is the purpose of a settlement agreement?
Settlement agreements are legally binding contracts which can be used to end the employment relationship on agreed terms. The main purpose of such an agreement is to prevent employees from exercising their right to make a claim to an ET or court. Settlement agreements usually include some form of payment to the employee by the employer and may also include a reference.
The Code suggests a minimum period of 10 calendar days is offered to employees to consider the proposed terms of a settlement agreement and to receive independent advice (unless the parties agree otherwise).
Settlement agreements are voluntary. An employee is not obliged to enter into a settlement agreement. Equally an employee does not have to accept the terms initially proposed by an employer. There can be a process of negotiation during which both parties make proposals and counter proposals until an agreement is reached, or not, as the case may be.
Can we help?
For advice, please contact a member of the team on 03456 381381 or email firstname.lastname@example.org.
How can we help?
To speak to one of our specialist legal teams, please click the button below.03456 381381
Make an enquiry